![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:08 • Filed to: crash test | ![]() | ![]() |
Chrysler 300: Result - Fail
Scion iA: Result - Good
Lexus ES350: Result -Good
Honda Pilot: Result - Good
Prius C: Result - Good
Audi Q3: Result - Good
(video courtesy of IIHS Youtube Channel )
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:14 |
|
Not really surprised the oldest car got the worst score. Was there any overlap test in ‘05 when the LX cars came out?
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:15 |
|
The basic structure of the 300
does
happen to be 15+ years old.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:17 |
|
The wheels on the Chrysler go round and round, round and round
The Driver’s legs go crush crush crush, crush crush crush
The Arterial Blood goes swish swish, swish swish
All through a small crash around the town.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:21 |
|
Or when that E-class was developed in the late 90s?
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:23 |
|
No the blood goes spurt spurt spurt.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:26 |
|
You are thinking Venous Blood, Arterial blood is more pressurized.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:28 |
|
Good point. Speaking of late 90’s mercs, I know if I’m hitting someone, do it straight on.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:29 |
|
Quite.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:38 |
|
Chrysler 300 - Old car, old architecture, predictable results.
Scion iA - Looks like they made a pretty smart choice using the Mazda2 sedan for the iA, but I can’t help but think this thing could be a pedestrian hazard in a crash. I mean, the bumper cover flew off, the battery went flying, and the hood all but completely came off as well.
Lexus ES - Pretty good job. Not sure if the fact that the dummy’s head stayed with the airbags instead of going back towards the headrest is a good thing or not, though.
Pilot - Definitely expecting a TSP+ on this one. Amazed that the left front wheel completely broke apart, resulting in the tire rolling away on it’s own after the impact.
Prius C - Not really sure how this got a Good rating, when the dummy’s head went right through both airbags and towards the dashboard and a-pillar.
Q3 - Another good test result for Audi. The wheel did the same as the Pilot, leaving the tire to go off on it’s own.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 10:56 |
|
I appreciate the importance of safety and crash test standards. However I can’t help but feel that the IIHS makes up tests to stay in business. What’s next a piano drop impact test?
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:04 |
|
Really I would feel pretty safe in a Chrysler 300 if it crashed.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:21 |
|
I wonder how the crash test might go with steel wheels. They should bend and absorb the energy more easily.
This might be a bit painful.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:23 |
|
I’d rather smash the rims then take it to the shin. Deformation is key, stiff stuff that keeps shape is not.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:25 |
|
What does the shape of the rear suspension and steering column have to do with overlap crash results?
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:27 |
|
They absolutely do. They’re aim is to reduce the cost of insurance payouts, if they can’t continue to do so, they have no reason for existing.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:39 |
|
The steering column is what the driver hits inside the car. The rear chassis has to be shaped to mount that design. Same with the interior to house that column. You can’t just plug in a suspension into any chassis. So yes, the chassis itself has elements dating back to the 90s.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:54 |
|
How does the rear of the car have to be shaped to mount the steering column? It doesn’t go anywhere near the rear of the car. And the steering column isn’t structural or chassis related.
You’re saying the rear suspension has to be designed around this part?
And that it’s at all related to the crash structure? Sure.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 11:59 |
|
Wow, way to purposely try to misread something.....use some common sense. I specified that the interior has to be built a certain way to use the steering column and that the chassis has to be made and designed a certain way for the rear suspension. Where you got what you got.....I have no clue.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 12:00 |
|
Why did the Chrysler fail? It looked fine to me. Unless I missed something?
![]() 09/15/2015 at 12:09 |
|
The steering column is what the driver hits inside the car. The rear chassis has to be shaped to mount that design.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 12:32 |
|
What does the shape of the rear suspension and steering column have to do with overlap crash results?
That was your previous post. Then I respond with
“The steering column is what the driver hits inside the car. The rear chassis has to be shaped to mount that design. “
Did you forget what you asked?
![]() 09/15/2015 at 12:51 |
|
The overlap test happens at the front of the vehicle. Neither the steering column nor the rear suspension design (pretty much the only things to come from the e-class) have any effect on the small overlap test. Your wording makes it sound like you meant the rear suspension needs to be designed with the steering column in mind.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 14:20 |
|
The 300 doesn’t look bad, seems about the same. I don’t get it.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 20:54 |
|
Watch the overhead view, where you can see the left front wheel suddenly appear under the steering wheel.
![]() 09/15/2015 at 23:30 |
|
Still don’t see it. Sorry.
![]() 09/16/2015 at 00:48 |
|
Given that IIHS has access to a gargantuan pile of insurance data, that’s basically true, but it is beneficial. They went through the data and found a lot of people were dying in this type of crash, so they designed a test to ensure that newer cars would be safer in this situation in order to reduce overall deaths. It’s sort of a cat-vs-mouse game but their aim is to reduce the amount of money insurance has to pay people by reducing deaths and injuries in accidents.
![]() 09/16/2015 at 09:50 |
|
Not that I don’t believe them, but it seems unlikely to me that people are basically hitting brick walls at high speeds just on the front corner. I could see how you may hit an oncoming car in that manner, but the oncoming car has crumple zones. The object they are hitting does not.
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:04 |
|
LOlol :]
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:05 |
|
I support the piano drop test
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:06 |
|
the 300 result was predictable indeed. I still expected a bit more A pillar crush like the Lincoln MKZ or whatever the sedan is called. That thing sucked big time
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:06 |
|
Maybe too much G force and leg damage
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:07 |
|
OUCH!!!!!!
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:07 |
|
lol indeed
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:07 |
|
I thought the same for the current Lincoln sedan... but that had a waaay worse cash test result
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:08 |
|
Maybe their g-force data and leg damage
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:32 |
|
The front wheel in the 300 gets driven straight back into the driver’s foot well. Foot well intrusion is the main mode of failure on these.
![]() 09/16/2015 at 11:49 |
|
Ah gotcha.
![]() 09/16/2015 at 12:03 |
|
The MKS? Or MKZ?